 harry + quirrell, possible mistake sorry |
This translator is for your use, but if you use it, please realize that you must reply to messages in English. Thanks and enjoy!
  |
 Sep 11 2006, 03:58 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
HP Fan  Group: Members Posts: 209 Joined: 13-December 05 From: Ireland Member No.: 4,299  |
hey,
just reading ps and when in the leaky cauldron, harry shakes quirrells hand... what happened to the love thing...??? unless of course quirrell went travelling after that??? |
 |
 
|
|
Sep 11 2006, 04:45 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Hugest HP Fan Group: Members Posts: 2,540 Joined: 18-August 06 From: United Kingdom, London Member No.: 5,324 |
In the movie Harry did not shake his hand. Argh the movies make the story harder to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 08:12 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie HP Fan Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Spinner's End Member No.: 5,410 |
Maybe it's possibe that he could shake his hand then, because Voldemort wasn't strong enough inside Quirrel yet for the "LOVE" to burn him. Either that or because Harry had not started school yet, therfore he wasn't yet a trained wizard? Not sure why, but it is a great observation on your part martinmiggs101 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 07:03 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Huge HP Fan Group: Members Posts: 1,872 Joined: 20-August 05 From: Sunny California Member No.: 3,572 |
Possibly it's because V wasn't exposed when they shook hands, so he didn't need to defend himself then. Or maybe he wasn't actually being attacked by V, so his instinct didn't make the "love" thing work. These are the only possible theories I could cook up. I think that maybe you could combine them as in he wasn't exposed or attacking Harry, so he didn't need to defend himself.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2006, 07:28 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Greatest HP Fan That Ever Lived Group: Guests Posts: 7,777 Joined: 21-February 04 From: Over the rainbow on the Western end of Oz Member No.: 3 |
If I remember correctly, Quirrel wasn't yet being possessed by V at the time he met Harry in the Leaky Cauldron. He was being controlled by him, but not yet possessed by him.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 02:48 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
HP Fan Group: Members Posts: 209 Joined: 13-December 05 From: Ireland Member No.: 4,299 |
i suppose... just reading back again and i realised that harry only noticed quirrels turban at the sorting...
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 11:04 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Greatest HP Fan That Ever Lived Group: Guests Posts: 7,777 Joined: 21-February 04 From: Over the rainbow on the Western end of Oz Member No.: 3 |
Right. And then at the end of GOF, V mentions how he made Quirrel bring him back to England and then after a while took possession of Quirrel's body.
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2006, 10:29 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 13-October 06 Member No.: 5,598 |
QUOTE(WickedWitchOfTheWest @ Sep 20 2006, 02:28 AM) [snapback]111509[/snapback] If I remember correctly, Quirrel wasn't yet being possessed by V at the time he met Harry in the Leaky Cauldron. He was being controlled by him, but not yet possessed by him. yeah, i would think that's correct. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 13 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Huge HP Fan Group: Members Posts: 1,872 Joined: 20-August 05 From: Sunny California Member No.: 3,572 |
Ahhhh clever! This reminds me a bit of Wormtail. He was too much of a coward to stay on the "good side". Poor, poor people.
|
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 05:37 am |